Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Luca Fantini vs Devin Badenhorst Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Fantini vs Badenhorst analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On The P1 vs P2 Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
:Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Luca Fantini vs Devin Badenhorst Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Fantini 0 - 0 Badenhorst
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Fantini has won 51.99% of points on their second serve, while Badenhorst has won 55.89%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Fantini, in recent form, has won 51.66% of their opponent's second serve points, while Badenhorst has won 50.6%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.97% and 36.04% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Fantini has saved 53.73% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Badenhorst has saved 63.16% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Fantini has won 56.14% of matches played (W/L 32/ 25), with Badenhorst winning 65.52% (W/L 19/ 10) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Fantini has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 60% (W/L 52/ 34), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Badenhorst has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 34/ 27), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 1/ 2).
- Player level: In the last year, Fantini has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 56.6% of matches (W/L 30/ 23), where as Badenhorst has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 65.52% of matches (W/L 19/ 10). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Fantini has played against opponents with an average rank of 99.25 while Badenhorst has played against players with an average rank of 74.45.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Fantini has won 58% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Badenhorst has won 80% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Fantini has converted 44.44% of breakpoint opportunities, and Badenhorst has converted 37.97% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
819
Rank
798
High
23
Age
Plays
0
Total0
0
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
N/A
Rank
High
20
Age
Plays
W
W
L
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
W
L
W
W
W
W
L
60% (97-66)
Career Total W/L
55% (35-29)
54% (13-11)
YTD W/L
78% (7-2)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Luca Fantini vs Devin Badenhorst For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Fantini VS Badenhorst
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit Doubled
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
Fantini VS Badenhorst H2h Matches played
No H2H Matches Available
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Luca Fantini | Devin Badenhorst |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 54% (13/11) | 78% (7/2) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 53% (27/24) | 70% (14/6) |
| Games Win/Loss | 51% (231/220) | 55% (113/92) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 50% (5/5) | 78% (7/2) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 57% (8/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.22 | 0.42 |
| Aces Total | 48 | 42 |
| DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.16 |
| DFs Total | 44 | 16 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:24:37 | 1:45:53 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 95.42 | 87.67 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (796/1273) | 61% (416/679) |
| 1st Serve W% | 64% (506/796) | 66% (276/416) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 52% (248/477) | 56% (147/263) |
| BPs Won% Total | 44% (60/135) | 38% (30/79) |
| Return Pts W% | 41% (520/1257) | 41% (286/693) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 55% (11/9) | 78% (7/2) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 59% (13/22) | 78% (7/9) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 40% (2/5) | 75% (3/4) |
| Deciding Set W% | 80% (4/5) | 100% (2/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 92% (12/11) | 100% (6/6) |
| 1st set W, L | 8% (12/1) | 0% (6/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 17% (12/2) | 33% (3/1) |
Luca Fantini Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats 
Aryan Shah
Player
Luca Fantini
58%
(
19 of
33)
1st Serve %
62%
(
31 of
50)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
2
84%
(
16 of
19)
1st Serve Won
29%
(
9 of
31)
57%
(
8 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
53%
(
10 of
19)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
9 of
33)
Rtn Points Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
55
Total Points Won
28
|
6-0 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Marc Van Der Merwe
68%
(
59 of
87)
1st Serve %
72%
(
75 of
104)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
5
61%
(
36 of
59)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
43 of
75)
54%
(
15 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
25%
(
5 of
20)
Break Points Won
80%
(
4 of
5)
41%
(
36 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
48 of
104)
99
Total Points Won
92
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Daniil Savelev
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve %
70%
(
39 of
56)
-
Aces
-
3
Double Faults
6
68%
(
21 of
31)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
20 of
39)
60%
(
6 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
24%
(
4 of
17)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
14 of
41)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Luca Fantini
55%
(
39 of
71)
1st Serve %
68%
(
34 of
50)
4
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
64%
(
25 of
39)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
10 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
24 of
50)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Parth Aggarwal
63%
(
76 of
120)
1st Serve %
62%
(
58 of
94)
-
Aces
-
4
Double Faults
4
59%
(
45 of
76)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
34 of
58)
57%
(
25 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
36%
(
5 of
14)
42%
(
50 of
120)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
94)
112
Total Points Won
102
|
4-6 7-6(2) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Marco Cecchinato
Player
Luca Fantini
59%
(
27 of
46)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
1
89%
(
24 of
27)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
27 of
42)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
8 of
20)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
10 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
27 of
62)
63
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
S D Prajwal Dev
Player
Luca Fantini
54%
(
7 of
13)
1st Serve %
57%
(
13 of
23)
-
Aces
-
-
Double Faults
-
86%
(
6 of
7)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
7 of
13)
50%
(
3 of
6)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
12 of
23)
21
Total Points Won
15
|
4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Benjamin Lock
Player
Luca Fantini
73%
(
58 of
80)
1st Serve %
48%
(
34 of
71)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
3
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
22 of
34)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
14 of
37)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
41%
(
33 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
35 of
71)
82
Total Points Won
69
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
Edison Ambarzumjan
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
49%
(
28 of
57)
3
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
2
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
24%
(
11 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
42
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Luca Fantini
Player
S D Prajwal Dev
62%
(
76 of
122)
1st Serve %
52%
(
53 of
101)
7
Aces
6
2
Double Faults
1
70%
(
53 of
76)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
41 of
53)
57%
(
26 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
6%
(
1 of
16)
35%
(
43 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
36 of
101)
115
Total Points Won
108
|
6-7(4) 6-1 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
view more
Devin Badenhorst Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F |
Stats
Khololwam Montsi
Player
Devin Badenhorst
70%
(
44 of
63)
1st Serve %
67%
(
36 of
54)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
1
73%
(
32 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
68%
(
13 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
10 of
18)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
29%
(
18 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
24 of
54)
69
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Aryan Shah
63%
(
75 of
119)
1st Serve %
62%
(
68 of
109)
8
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
0
67%
(
50 of
75)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
50 of
68)
52%
(
23 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
49%
(
20 of
41)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
39%
(
46 of
119)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
39 of
109)
112
Total Points Won
116
|
4-6 7-6(3) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Alec Beckley
66%
(
73 of
111)
1st Serve %
61%
(
73 of
119)
1
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
7
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
44 of
73)
53%
(
20 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
19 of
46)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
55%
(
6 of
11)
41%
(
46 of
111)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
56 of
119)
121
Total Points Won
109
|
6-4 4-6 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Philip Henning
63%
(
47 of
75)
1st Serve %
60%
(
45 of
75)
8
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
2
70%
(
33 of
47)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
28 of
45)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
15 of
30)
38%
(
3 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
33%
(
25 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
32 of
75)
82
Total Points Won
68
|
6-3 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Parth Aggarwal
48%
(
37 of
77)
1st Serve %
63%
(
56 of
89)
3
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
32 of
56)
53%
(
21 of
40)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
57%
(
4 of
7)
43%
(
33 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
42 of
89)
86
Total Points Won
80
|
7-5 7-5 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Connor Henry Van Schalkwyk
Player
Devin Badenhorst
63%
(
46 of
73)
1st Serve %
61%
(
47 of
77)
3
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
67%
(
31 of
46)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
30 of
47)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
25%
(
2 of
8)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
32%
(
23 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
30 of
77)
80
Total Points Won
70
|
6-4 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Luc Koenig
66%
(
37 of
56)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
4
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
4
73%
(
27 of
37)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
53%
(
10 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
8 of
22)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
34%
(
19 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
27 of
55)
64
Total Points Won
47
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Ishaque Eqbal
59%
(
34 of
58)
1st Serve %
73%
(
45 of
62)
9
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
2
74%
(
25 of
34)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
26 of
45)
58%
(
14 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
29 of
62)
68
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Devin Badenhorst
Player
Dylan Salton
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
71%
(
34 of
48)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
1
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
21 of
34)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
7 of
14)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
20 of
48)
58
Total Points Won
42
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Matthew Dellavedova
Player
Devin Badenhorst
64%
(
35 of
55)
1st Serve %
54%
(
36 of
67)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
2
57%
(
20 of
35)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
50%
(
10 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
45%
(
25 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
34 of
67)
64
Total Points Won
58
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Fantini Vs Badenhorst Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Fantini are available here and Badenhorst photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
